Your search

During two decades (1986 - 2008) of geochronological work in Heimefrontfjella, nearly 130 geochronological ages were produced using a wide range of geochronological techniques. The ages fall into four broad age groups from Archaean to Cenozoic times, revealing a long and complex geological history. In general, Heimefrontfjella consists of Mesoproterozoic high grade basement related to the ∼1100 Ma Maud Belt. This basement is overlain by Permo-Carboniferous sedimentary rocks and Jurassic lavas. Archaean and Palaeoproterozoic detrital zircon ages are recorded from meta-sedimentary rocks probably characterizing the foreland of the Maud Belt. The protolith and metamorphic ages of the Mesoproterozoic Maud Belt fall into two groups. An older age group from ∼1200-1100 Ma is related to back-arc and island arc volcanism. High-grade metamorphism in the Maud Belt is dated between 1090-1060 Ma and is thought to reflect continent-continent collision, possibly related to the formation of Rodinia. Regional cooling to below 500-300 °C at ∼1010-960 Ma in part of the mountain range might indicate rifting of Rodinia. The eastern part of the mountain range is overprinted by the ∼600-500 Ma East African-Antarctic Orogen. The orogenic front of this major mobile belt is exposed in the study area as the Heimefront Shear Zone. East of this major lineament all Ar-Ar, K-Ar and Rb-Sr mineral ages are reset to ∼500 Ma. Initial Gondwana rifting affected the area at c. 180 Ma, when the Bouvet/Karroo mantle plume caused dynamic uplift of the area, followed by burial underneath up to 2 km of Jurassic lava. This led to tempering of the basement up to about 100 °C, as indicated by apatite fission track data. The lava pile underwent erosion in Cretaceous time, when renewed rifting affected the region. Latest tectonic movements might be related to Cenozoic ice loading related to the built up of the Antarctic ice sheet.

The Jutulsessen nunataks (72°00′S; 2°30′E), Gjelsvikfjella, Dronning Maud Land (DML), consist mainly of migmatites of two types. A heterogeneous banded amphibolite facies gneisses and a more homogeneous part. In the more homogeneous part, partial melts form along axial planes to tight folds. Numerous pegmatitic dykes occur in both migmatites. The homogeneous part of the migmatite has a granodiorite composition. It displays the depletion of Nb–Ta typical for rocks from destructive plate margins and a strongly fractionated REE pattern, specially in LREE (La/Lu ratios varying between 500 and 800). SIMS dating of zircon from the homogeneous migmatite and two pegmatite dykes resulted in two age groups. A concordant age of 1163±6 Ma is calculated from zircon crystals with no rim/core structure and from cores from structurally complex crystals. This age represents the age of the protolith of the migmatite. A Cambrian age of 504±6 Ma is obtained from zircon rims and from sector-zoned zircons. This age represent the time of migmatisation. Sm–Nd depleted mantle model ages range from 1390 to 1770 Ma and suggest that the protolith to the migmatites contained components of older crust (pre-1163 Ma). An igneous complex consisting of a syenite plug (Stabben syenite), gabbroic rocks and aplitic dykes intrudes the metamorphic complex. The syenite and the aplitic dykes are neither deformed nor migmatised or penetrated by pegmatitic dykes. These rocks have elevated LREE and LILE concentrations with an La/Lu ratio of 450 and an Nb–Ta trough. The gabbroic rocks range in composition from melagabbro to monzogabbro and host numerous pegmatitic dykes. SIMS zircon U–Pb data from the Stabben syenite give an age of 500±8 Ma. This age is regarded as the intrusive age of the Stabben syenite. By the single zircon–Pb evaporation method an age of 495±14 Ma is obtained from the aplitic dykes. Sm–Nd depleted mantle model ages between 1800 and 2220 Ma indicate that the dykes formed from a Paleoproterozoic source. A Mesoproterozoic volcanic arc setting of DML and a correlation with the Natal Province, as suggested by several authors, is supported by data in this study. The studied area has consequently been a part of the Kaapvaal/Kalahari craton since Mesoproterozoic time. The Cambrian migmatisation and the intrusions are interpreted as a result of post-collision activity related to the collision between the Kalahari craton and the combined block of Antarctica and Australia during the final assembly of Gondwana. This collision is suggested to be included in the Kuunga Orogeny introduced by Meerat and Van der Voo [J. Geodynam. 23 (1997) 223].

The formation of Gondwana during the late Neoproterozoic to early Cambrian times (550-530 Ma) was traditionally viewed as the welding of two, more or less contiguous, Proterozoic continental masses called East and West Gondwana. The notion of a united West Gondwana is no longer tenable as a wealth of geochronologic and structural data indicate major orogenesis amongst its constituent cratons during the final stages of greater Gondwana assembly. The idea that East Gondwana may also have formed through the amalgamation of a collage of cratonic nuclei during the Cambrian is controversial. Recent paleomagnetic, geochronologic and structural data from elements of East Gondwana indicate that its formation may have extended well into Cambrian time. Thus, the terms ‘East’ and ‘West’ Gondwana may be relegated to convenient geographical terms rather than any connotation of tectonic coherence during the Proterozoic. In addition, the paleomagnetic data also challenge the conventional views of the Neoproterozoic supercontinent Rodinia and the SWEAT fit. Alternative variants including Protopangea and AUSWUS are not supported by paleomagnetic data during the interval 800–700 Ma.

Ages of six volcanic and plutonic rocks on Barton Peninsula, King George Island, were determined using 40Ar/39Ar and K-Ar isotopic systems. The 40Ar/39Ar and K-Ar ages of basaltic andesite and diorite range from 48 My to 74 My and systematically decrease toward the upper stratigraphic section. Two specimens of basaltic andesite which occur in the lowermost sequence of the peninsula, however, apparently define two distinct plateau ages of 52-53 My and 119-120 My. The latter is interpreted to represent the primary cooling age of basaltic andesite, whereas the former is interpreted as the thermally-reset age caused by the intrusion of Tertiary granitic pluton. The isochron ages calculated from the isotope correlation diagram corroborate our interpretation based on the apparent plateau ages. It is therefore likely that volcanism was active during the Early Cretaceous on Barton Peninsula. When the K-Ar ages of previous studies are taken into account with our result, the ages of basaltic andesite in the northern part of the Barton Peninsula are significantly older than those in the southern part. Across the north-west-south-east trending Barton fault bounding the two parts, there are significant differences in geochronologic and geologic aspects.