Antarktis-bibliografi er en database over den norske Antarktis-litteraturen.

Hensikten med bibliografien er å synliggjøre norsk antarktisforskning og annen virksomhet/historie i det ekstreme sør. Bibliografien er ikke komplett, spesielt ikke for nyere forskning, men den blir oppdatert.

Norsk er her definert som minst én norsk forfatter, publikasjonssted Norge eller publikasjon som har utspring i norsk forskningsprosjekt.

Antarktis er her definert som alt sør for 60 grader. I tillegg har vi tatt med Bouvetøya.

Det er ingen avgrensing på språk (men det meste av innholdet er på norsk eller engelsk). Eldre norske antarktispublikasjoner (den eldste er fra 1894) er dominert av kvalfangst og ekspedisjoner. I nyere tid er det den internasjonale polarforskninga som dominerer. Bibliografien er tverrfaglig; den dekker både naturvitenskapene, politikk, historie osv. Skjønnlitteratur er også inkludert, men ikke avisartikler eller upublisert materiale.

Til høyre finner du en «HELP-knapp» for informasjon om søkemulighetene i databasen. Mange referanser har lett synlige lenker til fulltekstversjon av det aktuelle dokumentet. For de fleste tidsskriftartiklene er det også lagt inn sammendrag.

Bibliografien er produsert ved Norsk Polarinstitutts bibliotek.

Your search

Topic

biologi

Online resource

no

Results 19 resources

Abstracts

Warner, N., Cojocariu, C., & Scientific, T. (2018). Versatility of GC-Orbitrap mass spectrometry for the ultra-trace detection of persistent organic pollutants in penguin blood from Antarctica (p. 8 s.). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18413.90082

Using GC Orbitrap mass spectrometry to address analytical challenges with trace level detection of persistent organic pollutants in Antarctica.
Connolly, S. R., MacNeil, M. A., Caley, M. J., Knowlton, N., Cripps, E., Hisano, M., Thibaut, L. M., Bhattacharya, B. D., Benedetti-Cecchi, L., Brainard, R. E., Brandt, A., Bulleri, F., Ellingsen, K. E., Kaiser, S., Kröncke, I., Linse, K., Maggi, E., O’Hara, T. D., Plaisance, L., … Wilson, R. S. (2014). Commonness and rarity in the marine biosphere. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8524–8529. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1406664111

Tests of biodiversity theory have been controversial partly because alternative formulations of the same theory seemingly yield different conclusions. This has been a particular challenge for neutral theory, which has dominated tests of biodiversity theory over the last decade. Neutral theory attributes differences in species abundances to chance variation in individuals’ fates, rather than differences in species traits. By identifying common features of different neutral models, we conduct a uniquely robust test of neutral theory across a global dataset of marine assemblages. Consistently, abundances vary more among species than neutral theory predicts, challenging the hypothesis that community dynamics are approximately neutral, and implicating species differences as a key driver of community structure in nature.Explaining patterns of commonness and rarity is fundamental for understanding and managing biodiversity. Consequently, a key test of biodiversity theory has been how well ecological models reproduce empirical distributions of species abundances. However, ecological models with very different assumptions can predict similar species abundance distributions, whereas models with similar assumptions may generate very different predictions. This complicates inferring processes driving community structure from model fits to data. Here, we use an approximation that captures common features of “neutral” biodiversity models—which assume ecological equivalence of species—to test whether neutrality is consistent with patterns of commonness and rarity in the marine biosphere. We do this by analyzing 1,185 species abundance distributions from 14 marine ecosystems ranging from intertidal habitats to abyssal depths, and from the tropics to polar regions. Neutrality performs substantially worse than a classical nonneutral alternative: empirical data consistently show greater heterogeneity of species abundances than expected under neutrality. Poor performance of neutral theory is driven by its consistent inability to capture the dominance of the communities’ most-abundant species. Previous tests showing poor performance of a neutral model for a particular system often have been followed by controversy about whether an alternative formulation of neutral theory could explain the data after all. However, our approach focuses on common features of neutral models, revealing discrepancies with a broad range of empirical abundance distributions. These findings highlight the need for biodiversity theory in which ecological differences among species, such as niche differences and demographic trade-offs, play a central role.
McMinn, A., & Hegseth, E. N. (2003). Early spring pack ice algae from the Arctic and Antarctic: how different are they? (H. L. Huiskes, Ed.). Backhuys.
Killie, B., Savinova, T., Kleivane, L., Lie, E., Skaare, J. U., & Nygård, T. (1999). Antarktis. In J. Knutzen (Ed.), Miljøgifter og radioktivitet i norsk fauna: inkludert Arktis og Antarktis (Vols. 1999–5, pp. 189–196). Direktoratet for naturforvaltning.
Bakken, V., Isaksen, K., Mehlum, F., & Gjertz, I. (1997). Miljøovervåking på Bouvetøya. Natur, 97/98, 132–141.
Newton, I. P., Cooper, J., Mehlum, F., & Thor, G. (1994). A bibliography of terrestrial biological research in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica. South African Journal of Antarctic Research, 24(1/2), 111–124.

A bibliography of terrestrial biological research in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica, of 388 titles from 1954 to 1994 is provided as an aid to researchers working in the region.
Sømme, L. (1985). Dyr og planter på nunataker i Dronning Maud Land. Det norske videnskaps-akademi. Årbok, 1985(1985), 97–101.
Sømme, L., & Fevolden, S. E. (1979). De norske Antarktis-ekspedisjonene 1976-77 og 1978-79: biologiske undersøkelser på Bouvetøya og i havet. Det norske videnskaps-akademi. Årbok, 1979, 85–91.
Lawrence, P. N. (1978). Cryptopygus sverdrupi n.sp. A new species of Collembola (Isotomidae) from Sverdrupfjella, Antarctica, with notes on related species in five genera. Norwegian Journal of Entomology, 25(2), 15–20.
Øritsland, T. (1977). Food Consumption of Seals in the Antarctic Pack Ice (G. A. Llano, Ed.). Smithsonian Institution.
Sømme, L. (1977). Landstigning på Bouvetøya. A-Magasinet, 23, 6–9.
Øritsland, T. (1970). Biology and population dynamics of Antarctic seals. In M. W. Holdgate (Ed.), Antarctic ecology (Vol. 1, pp. 361–366, 447–450). Academic Press.
Øritsland, T. (1970). Norwegian pelagic sealing reconnaissance in the Scotia Sea, 1964. Polar Record, 15(94), 51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247400060393
Øritsland, T. (1970). Sealing and seal research in the south-west Atlantic pack ice, Sept.-Oct. 1964. In M. W. Holdgate (Ed.), Antarctic ecology (Vol. 1, pp. 367–376). Academic Press.
Quartermain, L. B. (1967). The first settlers. In South to the Pole : the early history of the Ross Sea sector, Antarctica (pp. 61–71). Oxford University Press.
Jonsgård, Å., & Ruud, J. T. (1964). Studies on the southern stocks of Blue and Fin whales (R. Carrick, M. Holdgate, & J. Prévost, Eds.). Hermann.
Dalenius, P., & Wilson, O. (1958). On the soil fauna of the Antarctic and of the Sub-Antarctic Islands : the Oribatidae <Acari>. Arkiv För Zoologi: Serie 2, 11(23).
Holgersen, H. (1945). Antarctic and sub-antarctic birds. In O. Holtedahl (Ed.), Scientific results of the Norwegian Antarctic expeditions 1927-1928 et sqq. Instituted and financed by consul Lars Christensen : Volume II (Vol. 23, pp. 1–100, ill.). Dybwad.
Skottsberg, C. (1940). Några drag av den antarktiska kontinentens biologiska historia. Det Kongelige norske videnskabers selskab. Forhandlinger, 12 (1939), 46–56.

Last update from database: 3/1/25, 3:17 AM (UTC)